$2CrO_{4(aq)} ^{2-}+2H^{+}{(aq)}\rightleftharpoons Cr{2}O_{7(aq)}^{2-}+H_{2}O_{(l)}$
If we increase the concentration of anything in this system, equilibrium will be disrupted and thus the system + other concentrations will change to re-establish equilibrium.
Suppose we add concentrated $HCl$.
What we have done is increased the concentration of a reagent, specifically $[H^+]$.
Logically, as the increased rate of forward reaction is initially faster than the reverse, when a new equilibrium is established, the forward rate will be faster than the reverse.
As the forward rate is faster than the reverse rate, the system is consuming more reagents than it produces. Thus the concentration of reagents falls.
As the reverse rate is slower than the forward rate, the system consumes less products than it produces, hence the concentration of products rises.
As a result of the changing concentrations, the forward rate will partially decrease as the concentration of reagents fall, and the reverse rate will partially increase as the concentration of products rises.
This occurs until the rates are equal, and equilibrium is thus re-established having shifted right.
Recall the equilibrium system $2CrO_{4(aq)}^{2-}+2H^{+}{(aq)}\rightleftharpoons Cr{2}O_{7(aq)}^{2-}+H_{2}O_{(l)}$
Hence, $K_{c} = \frac{[Cr_{2}O_{7}^{2-}]}{[CrO_{4}^{2-}]^2[H^{+}]^2}$
If we increase $[H^+]$ the forward reaction is favoured to oppose the change(consume $[H^+]$). This causes an increase in products, equilibrium position shifts right.
Recall the equilibrium system $2CrO_{4(aq)}^{2-}+2H^{+}{(aq)}\rightleftharpoons Cr{2}O_{7(aq)}^{2-}+H_{2}O_{(l)}$
It follows that:
When we dilute an aqueous system, the concentration of all products are decreased.
Recall the equilibrium system $2CrO_{4(aq)}^{2-}+2H^{+}{(aq)}\rightleftharpoons Cr{2}O_{7(aq)}^{2-}+H_{2}O_{(l)}$
There must be a winner, cause of course there must.
Hence, one of the reactions will slow down more and one will slow down less. This is the favoured reaction(slows down less).
Overall ion concentration is decreased. The reverse reaction produces more moles compared to the forward reaction(4-1). Hence the reverse reaction is favoured so more ions are produced, and thus partially counteracting the decreased overall ion concentration.
The forward reaction required the collision of 4 different ions
The reverse reaction requires the collision of 2 different species.
Hence, when the concentration of everything is decreased, the forward reaction is much more impacted by the dilution as it is even harder to have the 4 ions collide.
I will be referring to Le Chatelier's Principle as Le Shat from now on. Both because it is easier and it is funny.
We usually say partially counteract, but we must say only counteract for special cases. i.e. decomposition of $CaCO_{3}$.