So my favourite concert master big d gave me an idea when thinking about what we learnt in yr 10 chem.
So we're in a situation where we have a growing population, which means a growing energy demand. So, how do we fulfil this demand? Nuclear energy of course!!!
But, something people don't realise is that there's actually two ways to use nuclear energy, and one of them is WAY better than the other (no. 2).
So, we could probably use radioactive materials to make nuclear reactors, blah blah blah yr 11 physics (ewww!!!).
But then, we have to deal with yucky science which no one likes.
And so, I present the pros and cons.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Makes energy I guess | Yucky science |
| Employment!!! | People no like reactors (thanks chernobyl) |
| Fuel processing | |
| Waste is hard to store | |
| Big and ugly |
So clearly, nuclear reactors are dumb and stupid and dumb. So, here is the next, and better use of nuclear energy.
So the issue at hand is that there's a large demand. And now, common sense tells us that to tackle a high demand, we can either:
And so, solution number 2 chooses the 2nd option.
We are going to decrease the demand for energy with nuclear bombs.
Yes, this is exactly what it sounds like.
Thanks to Adobe Stock, here is a world map with the major cities.
Here is my proposal for "changes" we can make to the world map to solve this issue of a high energy demand. Below I have added some reasons for the selective deployment of bombs
Now, this will obviously reduce the demand for energy. Because like, there won't be many people left to demand energy. So, great solution! Now whatever coal plants remaining will certainly be enough to sustain the ravaged human population that remains.
Yeah this was really stupid
